Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Deepak And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 60
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18204 of 2018 Applicant :- Deepak And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Raj Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 1.2.2018 as well as the entire criminal proceeding of Case No. 341 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No. 980 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148,323,307,504 I.P.C. as well as charge sheet No. 7 of 2018, Police Station Baghpat, District Baghpat (State Vs. Sajjan and others).
The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.
The prayer for quashing the impugned order dated 1.2.2018 is refused.
However, it is provided that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail may be considered and decided expeditiously by the court below in accordance with law. For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 Pratima
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Deepak And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018
Judges
  • Ravindra Nath Kakkar
Advocates
  • Ram Raj Pandey