Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present 482 Cr.P.C. Petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Case No. 26 of 2010, under Section 110/11 Cr.P.C. pending before Additional City Magistrate, District Jhansi. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the impugned notice does not contain the substance of allegation which has been made against the applicant and has been issued in a routine manner on a printed format. It is further contended that the notice impugned is illegal and is liable to be set aside.
In reply to the above contention, it is submitted by learned A.G.A. that there is no illegality in issuing the notice.
From the perusal of the impugned notice, it appears that the substance of allegations made against the applicant has not been mentioned. It is a vague notice, therefore it is hereby quashed.
However, it shall be open to the learned Magistrate concerned to issue fresh notice, if necessary.
With the aforesaid direction, this application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 14.6.2010 F.H.