When the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted on 02.03.2017. Even on 02.03.2017, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption, ''for dismissal''. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter further. Therefore, the Transfer Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 03.03.2017 Index:yes/no eum/tsi To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.
2.The Family Court Judge III, Chennai.
Tr.C.M.P.No.736 of 2015 http://www.judis.nic.in