Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Deena Nath Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41685 of 2009 Petitioner :- Deena Nath Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Singh Parmar,Arun Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
None for the petitioner even when the case is called in revised list. Sri Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for the State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 29.10.2018 S.K.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Deena Nath Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 October, 2018
Judges
  • Pritinker Diwaker
Advocates
  • S P Singh Parmar Arun Tiwari

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.