Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Deelip Kumar Upadhyay vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6481 of 2018 Petitioner :- Deelip Kumar Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of U.P And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anil Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Petitioner claims to have been appointed as Assistant Teacher under sub-section 11 of Section 16-E of Intermediate Education Act, 1921. By the instant petition, petitioner seeks approval and salary from the third respondent-District Inspector of Schools, Varanasi.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the petition is squarely covered by a decision rendered in Sushil Kumar Yadav and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others, (Writ - A No. 48244 of 2017) passed on 31 October 2017, therefore, it is urged that the petition may be decided in terms of the aforementioned decision.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of in terms of the decision rendered in Sushil Kumar Yadav and another (supra). The decision shall be taken by the third respondent after hearing the fourth respondent.
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 A. Pandey
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Deelip Kumar Upadhyay vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2018
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Yadav