IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR REVIEW PETITION Nos.265/2019 & 326 – 328/2019 IN W.A.No.746-749/2019 BETWEEN:
1. DAYANANDA SHETTY S/O. LATE SEETHARAMA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT “SABINA APARTMENT”, OPP. CITY HOSPITAL, B3-B4, KADRI, MANGALURU – 575 001.
2. NAVEEN SHENOY S/O. GOPALAKRISHNA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NANDA GOKULA, NAGABRAHMA ROAD, BIKARNAKATTE, MANGALURU – 575 005.
3. GANESH M.P.
S/O. LATE KUTTAPPA M.P. AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT 1-83/4, “DATHVAYINI NILAYA”, ANGARAMAJALU, GORIGUDDA, MANGALURU – 575 002. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANGALURU – 575 001.
3. THE KARNATAKA ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, PARK HOUSE, BENGALURU – 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
4. MANGALURU CITY CORPORATION, MANGALURU – 575 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
5. P. JAYANDRA KOTIAN S/O. LATE P. PUDDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT OPP. DOOMAPPA COMPOUND, MANGALURU – 575 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R. NATARAJ, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL A/W SMT. M. JYOTHI, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2;
SRI K.N. PHANINDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR VAISHALI HEGDE FOR R-3) THESE REVIEW PETITIONS UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING THIS REVIEW AND RECALL THE ORDER DATED 31.05.2019 PASSED IN W.A.No.746-749/2019 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE W.A.No.746- 749/2019 TO FILE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Heard Sri Manmohan P.N., learned counsel for the petitioners and Addl. Advocate General, Sri R.Nataraj along with Smt. M.Jyoti, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2; and Sri K.N.Phaneendra, learned senior advocate for respondent No.3/State Election Commission.
2. After having heard the matter, we find no error apparent on the face of the record. The review petition is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE S*