Court No. - 18
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5999 of 2018 Petitioner :- Daya Ram Yadav Respondent :- Civil Judge And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed today, notices need not go to the private respondent.
The applicant has approached this Court for issuing direction to the Civil Judge (Junior/Senior Division), Sahar, Jaunpur to decide the application 6-C moved by the petitioner in Suit No.1514 of 2015 (Daya Ram Yadav vs. Rajendra Prasad and others), pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sahar, Jaunpur, expeditiously within stipulated time.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s Shiv Cotex Versus Tirgun Auto Plast P. Ltd and others, 2011 (89) ALR 232, has made the following observations:-
" It is high time that courts become sensitive to delays in justice delivery system and realize that adjournments do dent the efficacy of judicial process and if this menace is not controlled adequately, the litigant public may lose faith in the system sooner than later. The Courts, particularly Trial Courts, must ensure that on every date of hearing, effective progress takes place in the suit."
Considering the above, this petition stands disposed of with the direction upon the Court concerned to consider and decide the application 6-C moved by the petitioner in Suit No.1514 of 2015 (Daya Ram Yadav vs. Rajendra Prasad and others), in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Jitendra