Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Daya Ram vs Civil Judge

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8949 of 2018 Petitioner :- Daya Ram Respondent :- Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Chandauli And 04 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Shyam Bhasker,Prem Chand Pandey,Satya Prakash Tripathi Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
The sole prayer made in the instant petition is for issuance of a direction to the trial Judge to decide application for temporary injunction Paper No.6 Ga within a specified time.
The petitioner has instituted Original Suit No.49 of 2017 and wherein an application for temporary injunction was also filed on the date suit was instituted. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the defendants have duly been served as recorded in order dated 16.1.2018, but even then, the application for temporary injunction has not been decided so far.
Having regard to the facts of the case and the submissions made, the petition is disposed of by directing the trial court to decide the application for temporary injunction expeditiously, without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J) Order Date :- 30.11.2018 SL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Daya Ram vs Civil Judge

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 November, 2018
Judges
  • Manoj Kumar Gupta
Advocates
  • Vijay Shyam Bhasker Prem Chand Pandey Satya Prakash Tripathi