Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Daya Kumar Rajpoot vs Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9340 of 2019 Petitioner :- Daya Kumar Rajpoot Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Ajai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jai Shankar Audichya, learned counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, at the outset, submits that the petitioner is stranger to the lis and has no locus to maintain the instant writ petition against the fifth respondent, Mahesh Chandra, an ex-service man.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the fifth respondent an OBC had got appointment by declaring himself under the unreserved category (Brahman), therefore, an enquiry be instituted against him.
On specific query, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that fifth respondent though being an OBC was appointed in service under the unreserved category, which is permissible in law.
In view thereof, the writ petition being misconceived is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 K.K. Maurya
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Daya Kumar Rajpoot vs Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Ajay Kumar