all Contempts Prayer in Cont.P.No.204/2009 Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings and punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court, dated 01.12.2008 in W.P.No.7830 of 2007.
Prayer in Cont.P.No.205/2009 Contempt Petition filed under
Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings and punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court, dated 01.12.2008 in W.P.No.9844 of 2008.
Prayer in Cont.P.No.206/2009 Contempt Petition filed under
Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings and punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court, dated 01.12.2008 in W.P.No.9845 of 2008.
Prayer in Cont.P.No.207/2009 Contempt Petition filed under
Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings and punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court, dated 01.12.2008 in W.P.No.10074 of 2008.
!For Petitioner ... Mr.T.S.R.Venkat Ramana ^For Respondent ... Mr.V.Kasinathan * * * * * :COMMON ORDER These contempt petitions have been filed by the petitioners, praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court, on 01.12.2008, in W.P.Nos. 7830 of 2007, 9844 of 2008, 9845 of 2008 and 10074 of 2008.
2. By the order, dated 01.12.2008, this Court had quashed the impugned orders and had directed that a committee be constituted to examine the claim of the Contract Labourers, not covered by Section 12(3) Settlement for ex-gratia payment and for their absorption, on merits and in accordance with law. The respondents had been directed to pass appropriate final orders, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
3. At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petitions, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that the directions issued by this Court have already been implemented and communications have been sent to the petitioners by the second respondent, on 20.03.2009.
4. In such circumstances, since no further orders are required, the contempt petitions stand closed.
cs To
1.C.P.Singh (Chairman) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.
2.S.Muthuramalingam, Superintending Engineer, TNEB Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli (etc), Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli - 11.