Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Daoo Bhaiya vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47809 of 2017 Applicant :- Daoo Bhaiya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Chhavi Kant Vashistha,Mahesh Kumar Kuntal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Chhavi Kant Vashistha, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Takeshwar Yadav learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
This bail application has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No.1031 of 2017 under sections 21/22 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura, during the pendency of trial.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused has been falsely implicated. 300 grams Alprazolam a narcotic substance is shown to have been recovered from him which is more than commercial quantity.The applicant is not involved in any other criminal case. The applicant is absolutely innocent and is languishing in jail since 08.10.2017. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A.vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and it has been argued that the same has been found as Alprazolam after being tested.
In the light of the aforesaid arguments, looking to the fact of the case, it is not found to be a fit case for bail.
The bail application is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Daoo Bhaiya vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh I
Advocates
  • Chhavi Kant Vashistha Mahesh Kumar Kuntal