1. This appeal has been preferred by appellant, original opponent no.6 in M.A.C.P. No.839/1999, which was preferred by respondent no.1 herein, original applicant, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Kheda at Nadiad in connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 05.02.1999 in which respondent no.1 sustained severe bodily injuries.
2. The said claim petition was allowed in part by judgment and award dated 15.01.2004 whereby, the claimant was awarded total compensation of Rs.4,75,500/- along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of application till its realization with proportionate costs.
3. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Having gone through the impugned award, I find that the Tribunal has dealt with every aspect of the case in detail. The Tribunal appreciated the evidence on record in its proper perspective and has awarded compensation, which, in my view, is just, legal and appropriate. Learned counsel for the appellant was not in a position to point out from the impugned award as to where the Tribunal has committed any illegality or impropriety while deciding the claim petition. I am in complete agreement with the reasonings given by the Tribunal in its award and hence, find no reasons to entertain this appeal.
4. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
[K. S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/*