Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Dablu Pandey @ Krishna Kumar ... vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 August, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. Dinesh Gupta, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.04 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 341, 504, 506, 120-B, 34 I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Rajesultanpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.
The submissions of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case, he is having no criminal antecedent and is in jail since 12.01.2021. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicant that co-accused Chandrabhan Singh, having identical role, has already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 16.08.2021 passed in Bail Application No.4321 of 2021 (photocopy of bail order provided by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record). In these circumstances, the applicant is also entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the applicant for grant of bail, but he conceded the fact that co-accused Chandrabhan Singh, having identical role, has already been granted bail by this Court.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record, ground of parity as well as totality of fact and circumstances, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let applicant - Dablu Pandey @ Krishna Kumar Pandey - be released on bail in the aforesaid Case Crime, on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
(1) Applicant will not try to influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence of the case or otherwise misuse the liberty of bail.
(2) Applicant will fully cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when witnesses are present in the Court.
(3) Applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (a) opening of the case, (b) framing of charge; and (c) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
(4) The party shall file computer generated copy of order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by it alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person(s) (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number(s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked, before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
(5) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of the computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 18.8.2021 S. Shivhare
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Dablu Pandey @ Krishna Kumar ... vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 August, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Singh