IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.161 OF 2015 (IO) BETWEEN:
M/S.D.S.R.CONSTRUCTIONS, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.220, ‘DIVYA ARCADE’, 1ST FLOOR, 9TH MAIN, H.R.B.R.LAYOUT, 1ST BLOCK EXTENSION, KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560043, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI D.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI D.SUBBARAMA REDDY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI H.G.RAVI @ JAGGA, SON OF LATE GURUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOODI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, EAST TALUK BANGALORE -560036.
2. SRI H.G.CHANDRA, SON OF LATE GURUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOODI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, EAST TALUK BANGALORE -560036.
3. SRI H.G.MUNINARAYANA, SON OF LATE GURUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOODI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, EAST TALUK BANGALORE -560036.
4. SRI H.G.SURESH, SON OF LATE GURUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOODI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, EAST TALUK BANGALORE -560036.
5. SRI M.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 16.10.2015.
6. SMT.M.RAMA DEVI, DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 16.10.2015.
7. M/S.SRI MITRA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 16.10.2015.
(a) SRI P.KOTESHWARA RAO, DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 16.10.2015.
(b) SRI K.RAJAGOPALA REDDY, DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 16.10.2015. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.S.BIJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 R3 AND R4 SERVED, R5 TO R7 DELETED V/O/D 16.10.2015) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.11.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.26286/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE SUIT FOR APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 7 R.11(b) AND CPC., DATED 21.07.2014.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Counsel for the petitioner absent. No representation.
2. This petition is posted for admission and no interim orders were passed to stay the proceedings before the trial court.
3. The case status report pertaining to O.S. No.26286/2013 discloses that the said suit is disposed of as per order dated 09.12.2017. This revision petition was preferred against the orders passed on application under Order VII Rule 11(b) of CPC in O.S. No.26286/2013.
4. In view of the disposal of the said suit, the present revision petition do not survive for consideration.
5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ