Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shri D Puttanna And Others vs 12 Of The Contempt Of Courts Act

High Court Of Karnataka|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CCC NOs. 1551 AND 2052 TO 2068 OF 2018 (CIVIL) BETWEEN:
1. SHRI. D. PUTTANNA SON OF VEERAIAHNA DEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 2. SHRI. B. PUTTANNA SON OF BASAVANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 3. SHRI. G. REVANNA SON OF GURUSIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 4. SHRI. MAHADEVAPPA SON OF DEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 5. SHRI. B. LINGARAJU SON OF M. BASANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 6. SHRI. DORESWAMY SON OF NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 7. SHRI. VEERABHADRASWAMY SON OF V.B. SWAMY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 8. SHRI. MALLESH SON OF BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 9. SHRI. M. REVAMMA WIFE OF MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 10. SHRI. D. UMESH SON OF DEVARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 11. SHRI. KOTTURAPPA SON OF SIDDAVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 12. SHRI. S. PRABHUSWAMY SON OF SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 13. SHRI. D. ANKAPPA SON OF DEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 14. SHRI. MAHADEVAPPA SON OF JO SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 15. SHRI. MARISWAMY SON OF DEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 16. SHRI. G. MAHESH SON OF GURUMALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 17. SHRI. RAJASHEKARAMURTHY SON OF PUTTASWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 18. SRI. U.M. NAGARAJAPPA SON OF CHO MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT UMMATHURU VILLAGE SANTHEMARANAHALLI HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK-571 313. ... COMPLAINANTS (BY MS. GOWHAR UNNISA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VISWANATHA SHETTY V, ADVOCATE) AND:
SHRI. T. RAMESH BABU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS TAHSILDAR CHAMRAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT PIN CODE-571 313. ... ACCUSED (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU S. HIREMATH, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.2 ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 3 TO 12 ARE DELETED VIDE ORDER DATED 13.06.2019) THESE CONTEMPT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE COMMITTTED BY THE RESPONDENTS UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PUNISH THE RESPONDENTS FOR HAVING COMMITTED CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR DISOBEYING THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THIS COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.21934 OF 2016 AND WRIT PETITION NOs.23547 TO 23555 OF 2016 (GM-RES) DATED 09.11.2017.
THESE CONTEMPT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER An affidavit is filed by the accused. The same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the complainants submits that the orders dated 09.11.2017 and 24.08.2016 passed in Writ Petition No.21934 of 2016 and Writ Petition Nos.23547-23555 of 2016 which is sought to be disobeyed, has been complied with. Hence, the contempt proceedings are dropped.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE akc/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shri D Puttanna And Others vs 12 Of The Contempt Of Courts Act

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Ravi Malimath
  • H P Sandesh