IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1476 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
D. NAGARAJU SON OF DODDAIDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS SOGALA VILLAGE, VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIJAY RAJA ARSU.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. VISHWANATHA SON OF PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
2. VISHVESHWARA SON OF PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
[ BOTH ARE TWINS RESIDING AT SOGALA VILLAGE, VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
3. THE TAHSILDAR CHANNAPATNA TALUK, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.85/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATTANA RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.43/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC CHANNAPATNA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment On 06.08.2019, three weeks’ time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to comply with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal shall be listed for dismissal if the office objections are not complied with. Despite this order, the office objections have not been attended to. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. As such, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr