Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

D Bindhu /Defacto vs Balaji And Others

Madras High Court|14 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Appellant is said to be the victim concerned in Special S.C.No.1 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore. The case against the accused persons is for the offence under Section 294(b), 498(A), 420 of IPC and Section 4 and 3(1)(x) of SC & ST Act. The victim is said to be the wife of the first accused and the other accused are relatives of the first accused. After full trial, the Trial Court acquitted the accused of the said offences. The petitioner, who preferred an appeal in terms of Proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C., now seeks permission of this court to withdraw the appeal.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, by his letter dated 07.09.2017, requested the registry to list the above Criminal Appeal for withdrawal and hence the matter is listed today under the caption "for withdrawal".
3. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the petitioner does not wants to prosecute the appeal, as she has settled the outstanding issues out of court and seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. He has also made an endorsement on the appeal petition to that effect. As already noticed, the victim is the wife of the first accused.
4. Having regard to the relationship between the parties and inview of the above submission that they want to settle the issue out of court, I am inclined to permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
14.09.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes mst To The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vellore Sub-Division, Vellore.
N.AUTHINATHAN, J.
mst
CRL.A.No.661 of 2016
14.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

D Bindhu /Defacto vs Balaji And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 September, 2017
Judges
  • N Authinathan