Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2005
  6. /
  7. January

Cwt vs Jitendra Kumar (Huf)

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 January, 2005

JUDGMENT / ORDER

ORDER The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter refer-red to as "the Act") for opinion to this Court:
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the capital standing to the credit of Jitendra Kumar in M/s. Ratan Cold Storage along with the share of Jitendra Kumar in the appreciation of the value of the assets of M/s. Ratan Cold Storage is not assessable in the hands of the assessee in the status of HUF?"
2. The reference relates to the assessment years 1982-83 to 1985-86.
2. The reference relates to the assessment years 1982-83 to 1985-86.
3. We have heard Sri Shambhoo Chopra, the learned standing counsel for the revenue and Sri Shakeel Ahmed, learned counsel for the appearing for the respondent.
3. We have heard Sri Shambhoo Chopra, the learned standing counsel for the revenue and Sri Shakeel Ahmed, learned counsel for the appearing for the respondent.
4. The facts of the present case are similar to that of ITR No. 209 of 1988, ITR No. 62 of 1988 and WTR No. 70 of 1980 decided on 6-1-2005. This court has held that the share of profit in the firm and its accretion was an individual income of the respondent Jitendra Kumar and not assessable to the HUF.
4. The facts of the present case are similar to that of ITR No. 209 of 1988, ITR No. 62 of 1988 and WTR No. 70 of 1980 decided on 6-1-2005. This court has held that the share of profit in the firm and its accretion was an individual income of the respondent Jitendra Kumar and not assessable to the HUF.
5. Respectfully following the aforesaid decision, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
5. Respectfully following the aforesaid decision, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Cwt vs Jitendra Kumar (Huf)

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2005