Being aggrieved of Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the 6th respondent in respect of the assessment year 2012-2013, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal, along with Ext.P6 petition for stay, which are pending consideration before the 5th respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to the pendency of the above proceedings, the respondents are proceeding with coercive steps, as borne by Exts.P4&P5 revenue recovery notices, which hence are sought to be intercepted by this Court. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 5th respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
WP(c). No.30124 of 2014 2 Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with copy of the writ petition, before the 5th respondent, for further steps.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
In paragraph No.3 of the judgment dated 04/12/2014 in W.P.
(C) No.30124/2014 the following sentence is added as the last sentence.
“Coercive proceedings pursuant to Exhibits P4 and P5 shall be kept in abeyance till such time”
vide order dated 15/12/2014 in W.P.(C) No.30124/2014.
Pn