Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C.Velappan vs The Chief Engineer (Personnel)

Madras High Court|30 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and the petitioner himself has retired from service. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
30.01.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TK To The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board 800, Anna Salai, Chennai  600 002.
W.P.NO.17936 OF 2003
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C.Velappan vs The Chief Engineer (Personnel)

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
30 January, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.