(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for parties, it appears that the petitioner does have a planning permission. But the real allegation is of violation of the planning permission. To that extent, the notice dated 05.01.2017 may not be correctly reflecting the factual situation.
2. It is thus agreed that respondent Nos.2 and 3 will cause an inspection to be made at site within fifteen days from today and the petitioner will be informed of the violations, if any. The petitioner will ensure that the violations are removed and only thereafter, he will carry out any further construction. If the petitioner fails to comply with the same, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 would be within their rights to proceed to take action in accordance with law against the unauthorised construction.
3. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.2495 of 2017 is closed.
(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S., J.) 02.02.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bbr To
1.The Sub Collector, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District.
2.The Assistant Director, Office of Town & Country Planning, Town & Country Planning, Thiruvallur Zone, Thiruvallur District.
3.The Executive Officer, Ponneri Town Panchayat, Thiruvallur District.
The Hon'ble Chief Justice and M.Sundar, J.
bbr W.P.No.2534 of 2017 02.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in