Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C.Suman vs State Represented By

Madras High Court|14 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition is filed for quashing the FIR in Crime No.98 of 2017 pending on the file of the first respondent. It is stated that the complaint was lodged by the second respondent as against the petitioner and others, for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 of I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2) (vii) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes Act 1989.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is also belonging to Scheduled Caste community and that therefore the complaint under the provision of Special Act namely the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 is not sustainable.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has admitted the fact that the petitioner is belonging to the Scheduled Caste community and therefore the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has also conceded the position that as against the petitioner no offence under the Special Act namely the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 is made out. Considering the facts and circumstances and other offences are made out from the complaint, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
4.The First Information Report in Crime No.98 of 2017, dated 07.08.2017, pending on the file of the first respondent is quashed so far as the complaint in relation to the alleged offences under sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s),3(2) (vii) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes Act 1989. It is stated that the complaint was earlier referred to the District Superintendent of Police, who is the competent authority to hold enquiry under the Special Enactment . In view of the fact that the First Information Report is quashed so far as the offences attracting the provisions of Special Enactment further investigation shall be conducted by the first respondent for other offences. Therefore this court direct the District Superintendent of Police to hand over the case file in Crime No.98/2017 to the first respondent for further investigation. The first respondent is also directed to complete the investigation and file a final report in respect of other offences within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the case files from the District Superintendent of Police.
5. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
To
1.The Inspector of Police, Thermal Nagar Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C.Suman vs State Represented By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 November, 2017