Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C.Senthilkumar vs Revathi @ Parimaladevi

Madras High Court|16 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled before the lower Court and hence the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.11.2017 Index: Yes/No gsa To The Judge, Second Additional Subordinate Court, Erode.
V.M.VELUMANI,J.
gsa C.R.P.(PD)No.4250 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 16.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C.Senthilkumar vs Revathi @ Parimaladevi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 November, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.