Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Crl.O.P.No.15025 Of 2017 vs The Commissioner Of Police

Madras High Court|07 August, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to register FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaints dated 17.07.2017 & 18.07.2017.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.Selvakumara Swami, learned counsel for the respondents 5 to 7.
3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of complaints given by him on 17.07.2017 & 18.07.2017 to the respondents, seeking for registration of FIR,, the same has been kept in abeyance without any action. It is well settled in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2013 (6) CTC 353], that registration of an FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if an information furnished to the police officer disclose commission of a cognizable offence and in cases where the information does not disclose a cognizable offence, a preliminary enquiry has to be conducted.
4.The respondent is not justified in having received the complaint and keeping it unattended without any further action. In view of the same, the petitioner has made out a case for this Court to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Hence, the third respondent is directed as follows:
1)If the information received by the second respondent discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then, the same shall be forthwith registered.
2)If an information received does not disclose a cognizable offence, the third respondent shall conduct a preliminary inquiry to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed therein or not and such inquiry shall be completed within a period of seven days from the date of information.
3)If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered.
4)If the preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, the disclosure report must be recorded along with the reasonings and a copy of the same shall be furnished to the complainant within one week.
5)All information relating to cognizable offences whether resulting in registration of FIR or leading an inquiry must be reflected in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the third respondent's police station.
5.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed with the above directions.
07.08.2017 Index:Yes/No dn To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar Region, Chennai City Police, Adyar, Chennai-600 020.
3.The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, J-2, Adyar Police Station, Chennai-600 020.
4.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Adyar Police Station, Chennai-600 020.
5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
M.S.RAMESH.J, dn Crl.O.P.No.15025 of 2017 07.08.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Crl.O.P.No.15025 Of 2017 vs The Commissioner Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 August, 2017