SALIM AHMED SAYEED Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Criminal Misc.Application No. 6023 of 1999 MR SAURIN A SHAH for Petitioners PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 MR SK BUKHARI for Respondent No. 2
2. Criminal Misc.ApplicationNo 6897 of 1999 MR SK BUKHARI for Petitioners MR SAURIN A SHAH for Respondent No. 1, 2
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH Date of Order: 13/09/2000 COMMON ORDER Mr. Saurin A. Shah appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S.K.Bukhari appearing for respondent no.2 in Misc. Criminal Application No. 6023 of 1999.
Mr. S.K.Bukhari appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Saurin A. Shah appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2 in Misc. Criminal Application No. 6897 of 1999.
Mr. K.G.Sheth, leaned APP appears for State.
Learned advocates for the parties make a statement that both the matters have become infructous as the Police Investigating Agency has submitted its report to the concerned Court for obtaining "C" summary. Therefore, according to them, these two petitions do not survive and have become infructous. In above view of the matter, these two petitions are ordered to be disposed of in terms of the above statement made by the learned advocates for the parties.
The petitioner in both petitions will be at liberty to make appropriate submission before the learned Magistrate when the hearing of report of the Police Investigating Agency for obtaining "C" summary take place. Direct service is permitted.
(D.P.Buch,J) (vipul)