Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Delhi
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

COMPANIES ACT vs ESTATE

High Court Of Delhi|17 December, 2012
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement for de-merger of Real Estate Division of GREEN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Demerged Company) into BERRY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (Resultant Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.
2. The registered offices of both the Demerged Company and the Resultant Company is situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Demerged Company and Resultant Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Application.
4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2012 of both the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the Application.
5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submitted that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.
6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of both the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.
7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Demerged and Resultant Company and the consents obtained from them for the proposed Scheme is clearly apparent from the chart given in the application which is as below:
8. A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders and Creditors of the Demerged Company and the Resultant Company.
9. In view of the written consents/NOC given, the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders of the Demerged Company and the Resultant Company are dispensed with.
10. That the Un-secured Creditors of both the Applicant Companies have given their written consents/NOC to the proposed Scheme. Accordingly, the requirement of convening meeting of Un-secured Creditors of both the Applicant Companies is also dispensed with. Further, the Applicant Companies do not have any Secured Creditors, accordingly there is no requirement of convening the meetings of the Secured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.
11. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms. Order Dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J DECEMBER 17, 2012 nandan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

COMPANIES ACT vs ESTATE

Court

High Court Of Delhi

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2012
Judges
  • Original
  • Indermeet Kaur