Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

The Managing Committee vs The Karnataka State Board Of Wakfs And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.33950/2016 (GM – WAKF) BETWEEN:
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, JAMIA MASJID (SUNNI), KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT – 562 117. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MR. SYED KHUDRATHULLA, 42 YEARS.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI.M.O.SULTAN, FOR SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVS.) AND:
1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 052.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
2. DISTRICT WAQF INSPECTOR, DISTRICT WAQF OFFICE, RAMANAGARAM, (APPOINTED AS ADMINISTRATOR TO JAMIA MASJID), KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT – 562 159.
3. SRI. ABDUL RAHEEM KHAN, S/O LATE PYARE JAN SAHEB, ADVOCATE, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT – 562 117.
4. SRI. SYED SIBGATHULLA, S/O LATE SYED AHMED SAHEB, MUSLIM BLOCK, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT – 562 117.
5. SRI. ASHRAF, S/O BALE SAHEB, TEACHER, GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, KADAGATHIKUPPA, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT – 562 117.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.S.R.ANURADHA, ADV. FOR R1; R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
VIDE ORDER DATED 03.10.2017 NOTICE TO R3 HELD SUFFICIENT;
R4 AND R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04.06.2016 PASSED BY R-1 - BOARD APPOINTING THE R-2 AS ADMINISTRATOR AND R-3 TO 5 AS MEMBERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE WAQF INSTITUTION VIZ., "JAMIA MASJID (SUNNI)" SITUATED AT KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT, AT ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri M.O.Sultan, learned counsel for Sri Naveed Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Smt. S.R.Anuradha, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the same has been rendered infructuous.
3. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
4. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE TL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Managing Committee vs The Karnataka State Board Of Wakfs And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 February, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe