IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.6986 OF 2019 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE TANZIMUL MUSLIMEEN FUND ASSOCIATION NOORANI SHADI MAHAL IMAM NAGAR DAVANAGERE - 577 001. REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SADIQ PAILWAN. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI NAVEED AHMED, ADV.) AND:
1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 052 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2. THE DISTRICT WAQF OFFICER NO.B-40, MUSLIM HOSTEL COMPLEX CHETANA HOTEL ROAD DAVANAGERE - 577 002. ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ACCORD APPROVAL TO THE OFFICE BEARERS OF PETITONER - MANAGING COMMITTE AS PER THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY THE R-2 BY ITS LETTER DATED 16.08.2016 AS PER ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Naveed Ahmed, learned counsel for petitioner.
Taking into account the order which this Court proposes to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.
3. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia has prayed for a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 03.01.2019 contained in Annexure-H to the writ petition.
4. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order.
5. In view of the aforesaid submission and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE ST