IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.38438 OF 2014 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
Managing Committee Muslim Jamath Mosque, Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk 571237 Kodagu District Represented by its President Sri P.M.Latheef Aged 54 years ... Petitioner (By Sri M.O.Sultan, Advocate for Sri Naveed Ahmed, Adv.) AND:
1. The Karnataka State Board of WAKFS No.6, Cunnigham Road, Bangalore-560052, Represented by its C.E.O 2. Mr.Haji Zainulabbidin Aged about 72 years, Cloth Merchant, Masjid Complex, Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District 3. Mr.Aboobuacker Aged about 45 years, Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District 4. Mr.Mohammed Anwar Aged about 35 years, R/at Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District.
5. Mr.Haji Nazeer Aged about 50 years, Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District.
6. Mr.Shoukath Aged about 44 years, R/at Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District.
7. Mr. Mammunji Haji Aged about 61 years, R/at Near KEB Main Road, Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District.
8. Mr.Sulaiman Aged about 52 years, R/at Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District.
9. Mr. Usman Aged about 45 years, R/at Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District.
10. Mr.Rafeeque M Aged about 53 years, R/at Sunticoppa, Somwarpet Taluk-571237 Kodagu District. ...Respondents (By Smt. S.R.Anuradha, Advocate for R1;
Sri M.H.Haneef, Advocate for R2, R5, R6 & R9; R3, R4, R7 and R8 are served, but unrepresented) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 12.07.2014 vide Annexure-A issued by the R-1 and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in B group this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous, hence the petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE GJM