The Hon'ble Mr.Justice HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND The Hon'ble Dr. Justice ANITA SUMANTH TAX CASE APPEAL No.815 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem .. Appellant Versus Sambandam Siva Textiles Ltd., Kattuveppalai Patti, Seshanchavadi, Salem 636 014. .. Respondent Tax Case Appeal file under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "D" Bench, Chennai dated 6th October 2006 passed in I.T.A.No.1744/Mds/2006.
For Appellant .. Mr.J.Narayanasamy
JUDGMENT
The Tax Case Appeal filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "D" Bench, Chennai dated 6th October 2006 in ITA.No.1744 /Mds/2006 has been admitted on 4.7.2008 for consideration of the following substantial questions HULUVADI G. RAMESH, J.
& DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
msr of law:
"1. Whether the replacement of machinery parts will amount to revenue expenditure or not?
2. Whether bringing into existence of a new asset or obtaining a new advantage would amount to revenue expenditure or not?"
2. Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 stipulates that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.20 lakhs. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than the monetary limit imposed and the appeal is hence, dismissed as not pressed, preserving the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
(H.G.R.,J) (A.S.M.,J) 13.02.2017
msr TAX CASE APPEAL No.815 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in