Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M V Seetharam Sah

Madras High Court|25 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND The Hon'ble Dr. Justice ANITA SUMANTH T.C.A. No.571 of 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. .. Appellant Versus M.V.Seetharam Sah .. Respondent Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, dated 27.09.2007 in ITA. No.2318/Mds/2005.
For Appellant .. Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondent .. Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar -----
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of this Court was delivered by ANITA SUMANTH, J.) This Tax Case Appeal is filed by the Department calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, dated 27.09.2007 in ITA. No.2318/Mds/2005 and has been admitted on 03.07.2008 for consideration of the following substantial questions of law:
“1.Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the protective assessment made in the hand of the assessee is valid in law, when the assessee himself has filed his return of income including his share of short terms capital gains therein?
2.Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, protective assessment has been made in the hands of the assessee it is valid in law when the same has been made in view of the fact that a second appeal of the firm M/s.Sapthagiri Finance and Investments, Kancheepuram, was pending and the demand was also kept in abeyance pending outcome of the second appeal of the firm?
2. Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, New Delhi in F.No.390/Misc./163/2010 J.C. dated 17.12.2015 stipulates that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.15 lakhs. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than the monetary limit imposed and the appeal is, hence, dismissed as not pressed, preserving the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
(H.G.R.,J) (A.S.M.,J) 25.01.2017 vga HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J AND Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J vga T.C.A.No.571 of 2008 25.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M V Seetharam Sah

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 January, 2017
Judges
  • Huluvadi G Ramesh
  • Anita Sumanth