Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Late S.M.Pandian

Madras High Court|13 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Rajiv Shakdher, J.)
1.Mr.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel for the Revenue, seeks to withdraw the captioned appeal on the ground that the tax effect is lower than what is stipulated in Circular No.21/15 dated 10.12.2015. Learned counsel further says that the question of law, though, be kept open.
2.Accordingly, as prayed for, the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving the question of law open. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.A., J.) (R.S.K., J.) 13.03.2017 Index : Yes/No Website : Yes/No sra To
1.The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, 'B' Bench.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai.
Rajiv Shakdher, J.
and R.Suresh Kumar, J.
(sra) T.C. (A) No.811 of 2008 13.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Late S.M.Pandian

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 March, 2017