IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.652 OF 2013 BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS BSK III STAGE BENGALURU.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS BSK III STAGE BENGALURU.
(BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S. BIOCON LIMITED 20TH KM, HOSUR ROAD ELECTRONIC CITY, HEBAGODI BENGALURU-560 100.
(BY SRI: T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANTS …RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.07.2013 PASSED IN ITA NO.369/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004- 2005, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.369/BANG/2010 DATED 16.07.2013 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, BENGALURU.
***** THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
2. In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE *bgn/-