Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii vs We Have Heard Mr. Manav M. Mehta ...

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)

1. We have heard Mr. Manav M. Mehta learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

2. Admit. We formulate the substantial question of law as under :

"(A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 47,81,300/- made by invoking provisions of section 40(a)ia) of the I.T. Act ?"

3. Issue notice to respondent. Paper book be HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Fri Feb 12 02:59:23 IST 2016 TAXAP/1377/2011 2/2 ORDER filed within three months.

[V.M.SAHAI, J.] [N.V.ANJARIA, J.] cmjoshi HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Fri Feb 12 02:59:23 IST 2016