Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Customs Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal And Others

Madras High Court|25 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND The Hon'ble Dr. Justice ANITA SUMANTH C.M.A. No.2025 of 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Central Excise Commissionerate, No.1, Williams Road, Tiruchirapalli-620 001. .. Appellant Versus
1. Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Sastri Bhawan Annexe, No.26, Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006.
2. M/s.Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Ltd., Kattur, Tiruchirapalli District. .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Final Order No.32/2007 dated 05.01.2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.
For Appellant .. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, CGSC For Respondents .. R1 Tribunal Mr.K.Vaitheeswaran for R2 -----
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of this Court was delivered by ANITA SUMANTH, J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the Department calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai, dated 05.01.2007 in Final Order No.32/2007 and has been admitted on 31.08.2007 for consideration of the following substantial questions of law:
“1.When the Rule 6(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2002 specifically bars allowing of credit on such quantity of inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods and 2.When sub-rule 2 of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 specifically excludes inputs used as fuel such as furnace oil from the concession of allowing Cenvat Credit extended to other inputs used in dutiable and exempted final products subject to observing certain procedures set out therein?”
2. Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, New Delhi in F.No.390/Misc./163/2010 J.C. dated 17.12.2015 stipulates that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.15 lakhs. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than the monetary limit imposed and the appeal is, hence, dismissed as not pressed, preserving the substantial question of law for determination in an appropriate case. No costs.
(H.G.R.,J) (A.S.M.,J) 25.01.2017 2/3 vga To Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Sastri Bhawan Annexe, No.26, Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006.
HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J AND Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J vga C.M.A.No.2025 of 2007 25.01.2017 2/3 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Customs Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 January, 2017
Judges
  • Huluvadi G Ramesh
  • Anita Sumanth