IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2019 PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY AND THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS WRIT APPEAL NO.1011 OF 2015 AND WRIT APPEAL NO.3195 OF 2016 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020.
2. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 APPELLANT NO.2 IS THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPELLANT NO.1 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.MURUGESH V CHARATI, APPELLANT) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001.
2. SMT. SUMATHI MOTHKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O SRI.S.R.LAKSHMIKANTHA REDDY RESIDENT OF HIG 9/4, 9TH CROSS KHB COLONY 2ND STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE-560 032.
(BY SRI.V.SREENIDHI, AGA FOR R1 ... RESPONDENTS SRI.M.N.MUNI REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NOS.22103- 22104/2012 DATED 11/07/2014.
THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, DEVDAS, J., DELILVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT A joint memo dated 07.03.2019 is filed before this Court on 29.06.2019 by the parties to these proceedings. The joint memo is signed by the appellants and respondent No.2 as well as their respective counsel.
2. In terms of the joint memo, respondents submit that they are not interested in contesting the Writ Appeals filed by the BDA. They further submit that they are ready to accept the compensation in the ratio of 40:60 scheme formulated by BDA for grant of compensation of sites.
3. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed another memo today seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petition filed by respondent No.2.
4. Accordingly, the parties to these proceedings pray that the Writ Appeals may be disposed of in terms of the joint memo and memo for withdrawal.
5. The joint memo filed by the parties and the memo filed by learned counsel for respondent No.2 are taken on record.
6. In view of the joint memo and the memo for withdrawal of the Writ Petition filed by the parties, these Writ Appeals are disposed of in terms of joint memo and the Writ Petitions also stand withdrawn by respondent No.2.
The order of the learned Single Judge to that extent stands modified.
SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE Prs*