Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C.Nathamuni vs 4 The Administrator

Madras High Court|17 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mrs.M.E.Rani Selvam, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 2 to 4.
2.The petitioner joined the services of Pallavan Transport Corporation, Chennai on 11.01.1986, which after merger and amalgamation and demerger and amalgamation, became new Transport Corporation namely, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited and he retired from the service as Special Grade Driver on 31.10.2016. He was drawing a salary of Rs.39,250/- at the time of retirement. The grievance now expressed by the petitioner is that he has retired from service on 31.10.2016 and the retiral/ terminal benefits such as Gratuity, Commutation, EL Surrender, RBS Arrears, IRT Amount, Settlement Arrears and DA arrears have not been settled and in this regard, has also submitted a representation dated 06.02.2017 to the respondent and despite, receipt and acknowledgement of the same, no orders have been passed so far and hence, came forward to file the present writ petition.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that a similar issue arose for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in WA[MD] No.383 to 457/2015 [K.Rajendran and others Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Limited rep. by the Managing Director, Madurai-10 and others] and the Division Bench, vide judgment dated 12.06.2015, has ordered the amounts to be paid in twelve equal monthly instalments with an interest @ 6% per annum and also with a default interest and prays for similar orders.
4.Heard the submissions of Mrs.M.E.Rani Selvam, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 4.
5.This Court has taken into consideration the said judgment and also the stand of the respondents including the Administrative Department in its order dated 19.01.2017 made in WP.No.42555/2016 [A.Annamalai Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Salem and others] and issued necessary directions and for the purpose of disposal of the cases, it is relevant to extract the common judgment made in the above cited writ appeal :- The learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has obtained written instructions vide letter No.7945/B/2015-2 dated 11/06/2015 that the terminal benefits of the appellants would be settled through twelve equal monthly installments, carrying interest of 6% p.a.
2. The said statement is thus taken on record and the respondents will be bound by the same. We have to keep in mind the judicial pronouncement of the Honourable Supreme Court in D.D.Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Utta Haryana Bujli Vitran Nigam Limited & Ors [2014 (e) scale -78] wherein it is held that in case of any delay in making the payment of the installments, the interest payable would become 18% p.a., for the delayed period apart from any other remedy which may be available to the appellants for non-compliance of undertaking given to this Court.
3. The instalments to be paid from July 2015 and each instalments should be paid on or before 7th of each month.
4. The Writ Appeals are disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
6.In the light of the above facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to settle the retiral/terminal benefits to the petitioner in twelve equal monthly installments commencing from 1st May, 2017 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum and in the event of default, the interest payable will become 18% per annum. The second respondent, apart from paying arrears of pension, shall also continue to pay the pension amount due and payable to the petitioner without any default.
7.The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.
17.02.2017 pri Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.
pri To 1 The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Secretary Transport Department Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai  600 009.
2 The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Vazhuthareddy, Villupuram  605 602.
3 The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Kancheepuram Region, Kancheepuram.
4 The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai  600 002.
W.P.No.3942 of 2017 17.02.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C.Nathamuni vs 4 The Administrator

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
17 February, 2017