IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 5190 OF 2017 (LB-RES) BETWEEN THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (EARLIER CALLED AS TOWN MUNICIPALITY) NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, B.H. ROAD, ARSIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI RAKSHITH K N, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573 103 3. THE TOWN CLUB (R) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SECRETARY, B.H.ROAD, ARSIKERE-573 103 HASSAN DISTRICT.
4. B.S.NANJUNDAPPA S/O DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT MARUTHINAGAR, ARSIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAYAKUMAR S.PATIL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT.BHRATI PATIL, ADVOCATEO FOR R-3) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP 17445/17 DATED 18/8/2017.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Mr.Rakshith K.N., learned advocate for the appellant, appears and submits, on instructions, that due to subsequent events, the appeal has become infructuous.
2. Mr.Jayakumar S.Patil, learned senior advocate appearing for Smt.Bharati Patil, learned advocate for the respondent no.3, informs us that, already, possession has been delivered by the appellant to the writ petitioner- respondent no.3.
3. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
4. We make no order as to costs.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE vgh*