Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Chunthaji vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|30 April, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Leave to amend the cause-title so as to indicate that correct nomenclature of respondent No.1, is granted. The necessary amendment may be carried out, forthwith.
2. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, with the following prayers:
"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this petition;
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no.1 to hear and decide the Revision Application No.MVV/JMN/GDHN/6/2010 within a reasonable period that may deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court.
(C) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent no.1 to hear and decide the application filed by the petitioners for early hearing within a reasonable time that may deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court.
(D) Any other relief deemed just and proper may please be granted in the interest of justice."
3. At the outset, Mr.Y.V. Vaghela, learned advocate for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners have filed an application for early hearing of the Revision Application pending before the Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department which has yet not been considered. It is submitted by Mr.Y.V. Vaghela, learned advocate for the petitioners that the interest of justice would be met, if the application for early hearing is considered in proper perspective by the Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department.
4. Upon the above statement being made by the learned advocate for the petitioners, the following order is passed:
The Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department shall consider and decide the application for early hearing of the Revision Application No.MVV/JMN/GDHN/6/2010 taking into consideration the factual background of the case, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. The petition is disposed of, in the above terms, without entering into the merits of the case.
Direct Service of this order, is permitted.
(Smt.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chunthaji vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2012