Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Chunnu Yadav @ Ustaj vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 February, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant, namely, Chunnu Yadav @ Ustaj in Case Crime No. 210 of 2020, under Section 13 of U.P. Gambling Act, 1867 and Sections 332, 353 IPC, Police Station Kabraee, District Mahoba.
By the order dated 12.10.2020 the interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant granting time to learned A.G.A. to file counter affidavit.
No counter affidavit has been filed as yet.
For the reasons given in the earlier order dated 12.10.2020, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail till cognizance is taken by the court on police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/concerned Court with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
Order Date :- 23.2.2021 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chunnu Yadav @ Ustaj vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 February, 2021
Judges
  • Siddharth