Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chotu @ Arshad vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 41
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 723 of 2019 Revisionist :- Chotu @ Arshad (Minor) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Amit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
The present criminal revision is filed seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 01.12.2018 passed by the learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Mathura, in Special Trial No. 857 of 2016 (State vs. Chotu) under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC read with Section 3/4 Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, P.S.- Refinery, District- Mathura.
After arguing at some length, counsel for the revisionist submits that he may be permitted to apply for a fresh medical examination of the girl with regard to her age.
It is open for the applicant to move such application before the Court below and in case, the applicant files such an application, the Court below shall consider and decide the same as expeditiously as possible.
With the aforesaid liberty, this criminal revision is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 21.2.2019 P Kesari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chotu @ Arshad vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 February, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary
Advocates
  • Amit Singh