Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Cholamandalam Ms General ... vs Jayakodi

Madras High Court|23 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The Insurance Company is the appellant herein.
2. The respondents 1 to 4 are the claim petitioners/legal heirs of the deceased Selvam, who died due to the injuries sustained in the accident caused by the lorry, which was insured with the appellant/insurance company herein on 15.02.2014.
3. Before the Tribunal, the Insurance Company filed a counter stating that the deceased has contributed to the accident and that the accident had taken place on the corner of the road, while turning towards left side and also hit by the lorry injured with the Insurance Company.
4. In the trial, the widow of the deceased P.W.2, Jayakodi and the eye witness/S.Durai was examined as P.W.2. Ex.P1 to Ex.P15 were marked and Ex.R1 to Ex.R4 were marked. On behalf of the respondent R.W.1 is also examined.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3
5. The Tribunal, on consideration of both oral and documentary evidence, has come to the conclusion that, the accident has taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry insured with the appellant/Insurance Company and Ex.R3 is the Insurance policy to demonstrate that on the date of the accident and the vehicle was duly insured with the Insurance Company. Accordingly, the tribunal held that both the respondents before the Tribunal are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation and taking into consideration of the documents, the tribunal arrived at a conclusion that a sum of Rs.11,95,000/- was awarded as compensation. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
7. After going through the evidence of P.W.2-S.Durai and also going through the evidence of R.W.1 and Ex.R2, it appears that the Tribunal has rightly come to the conclusion by fixing the negligence on the part of the lorry and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal appears to be just and fair and therefore, there is no infirmity in the award passed by the Tribunal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4
8. Accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed. No costs. The compensation awarded by the tribunal is hereby confirmed. The appellant is directed to deposit the balance amount of the compensation awarded by the tribunal, within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after deducting the amount already deposited by the appellant. On such deposit, the claimants/respondents 1 to 4 are permitted to withdraw their respective share amount, as apportioned by the Tribunal, on filing appropriate application. Consequently connected C.M.P is closed.
03.02.2023 nvi Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Special District Judge, Dharmapuri.
2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5 RMT.TEEKA RAMAN, J.
nvi Judgment in C.M.A.No.1954 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.15175 of 2018 03.02.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Cholamandalam Ms General ... vs Jayakodi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 February, 2017