Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chirag Varshney @ Chintu Baniya vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35617 of 2018 Applicant :- Chirag Varshney @ Chintu Baniya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Tewari,Sanjay Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.
Contention raised on behalf of the applicant has been confined to the extent that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. There is no point of indulging in the act of extortion as alleged. The applicant never interested in having any relationship with the informant side. The informant side is bent upon to exert pressure upon the applicant. No threat has been extended by the applicant to the informant side. In case the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.05.2018.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed prayer for bail. However, learned A.G.A. has not disputed the aforesaid facts.
Without entering into merit of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Chirag Varshney @ Chintu Baniya involved in Case Crime No.234 of 2018, under Sections 147, 336, 384, 504, 506, 507 I.P.C., Police Station Sasnigate, District Aligarh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate the prosecution witness.
(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 22.1.2019 rkg
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chirag Varshney @ Chintu Baniya vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 January, 2019
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Mishra I
Advocates
  • Arvind Kumar Tewari Sanjay Pathak