IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.16611 OF 2012 (KLR–RR-SUR) BETWEEN:
CHINNASWAMY REDDY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS ATTIBELE VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.S.VARADARAJAN, ADV.,) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT K.G. ROAD BENGALURU – 560 009 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB–DIVISION K.G. ROAD BENGALURU – 560 009 4. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL – 562 107 5. C. LAKSHMAIAH S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 6. C. SOMASEKHAR S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 7. C. LAKSHMINARAYANA S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 8. RAMESH S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 9. VENKATESH S/O CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESPONDENTS 5 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT NEAR CHANNAKESHAVA TEMPLE ACHAR ROAD, ATTIBELE TOWN ANEKAL TALUK – 562 107 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA, FOR RESPONDENTS-1 TO 4;
RESPONDENTS-5 AND 7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS, DATED 27.04.2012, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN REV. PETITION NO.456/10-11 AS PER ANNEXURE–A (ii) THE ORDER DATED 28.02.2011, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN CASE NO.RA(A) 229/07-08 AS PER ANNEXURE–B, (iii) ORDER DATED 13.11.07 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AS PER ANNEXURE–C ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In view of the memo dated 27.02.2017, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
SD/- JUDGE TL