NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.
This Writ Appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, has been preferred against the order passed, suo motu, by this court on 19th October 2016, in W.P.No.28498 of 2016.
2. Writ Petition No.28498 of 2016 is preferred by the Railway Employees Co-operative Society Staff Union, a Trade Union. It sought for a direction to the second respondent in the writ petition viz., the State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary, Department of Labour and Employment to refer the Industrial Disputes, raised by them, for adjudication immediately on receipt of the failure report from the first respondent in the writ Petition viz., the Labour Officer, Chennai and for a direction to the third respondent in the writ petition viz., the Chief Executive Officer, Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited not to alter the service conditions of the workers connected with the Industrial Dispute.
3. While entertaining the said writ petition, the learned Single Judge considered it appropriate to implead the Southern Railway as a party. For this purpose, the learned Single Judge assumed that the lis in the writ petition relates to Southern Railway Employees.
4. Mr.R.Krishnamurthy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, in our opinion, very rightly pointed out that the lis in the writ petition is not raised by the employees of the Railways at all, but, it is raised on behalf of the workmen, employed in the Railway Employees Co-operative Society. The employees of the Railway Co-operative Society cannot be considered or construed as employees of the Indian Railways. It is beyond any pale of doubt that the employees of the Railway Employees Co-operative Society cannot be treated as Union Government Servants and on that score, be treated as members of the Railway Service. It is, therefore, not warranted to implead the Southern Railway. Accordingly, we have no hesitation to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 19th October 2016, suo motu, impleading Southern Railway as fourth respondent.
5. The writ appeal stands, accordingly, allowed. From the array of parties of the writ petition, the Southern Railway viz., the fourth respondent shall stand deleted and the writ petition will be proceeded as against respondents 1 to 3 independently of this order. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(N.R.R.J.,) (S.M.S.J.,) 4.1.2017 Index :Yes/No.
Internet:Yes/No.
ssk To
1. Railway Employees Co-operative Society Staff Union (Reg.No.3432/CNI) rep. by its General Secretary, R.C.Cyril Thiyagaraj, No.2/30, Lettangs Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
2. The Labour Offier-I, 3rd Floor, Kuralagam, Chennai 600 108.
3. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Secretary, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.
4. The Southern Railway rep. by its General Manager, Central Chennai, Poonamallee, Chennai.
5. Union of India, Ministry of Railways, rep. by its Secretariat, Railway Bhavan, New Delhi 110 001.
6. The Chairman, Railway Board, Railway Bhavan, New Delhi 110 001.
NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO , J., and S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., ssk.
W.A.No.1413 of 2016 4.1.2017.
http://www.judis.nic.in