Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Chhotey vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7036 of 2018 Applicant :- Chhotey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bharat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Srivastava,J.
Heard Shri Bharat Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that though applicant is named in the F.I.R. and it is stated that he along with co-accused entice away the victim, however, as a matter of fact, victim had an affair with co- accused Harish Chandra and had gone with him out of her own sweet will, which is apparent from her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. It is also submitted that victim has given false statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. under pressure of family members and even according to that she had stayed in the house of the co-accused Harish Chandra for about a month without raising any alarm. Further submission is that per medical report, victim is major. It is also submitted that applicant, who is in jail since 17.12.2017 has no other criminal history and there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicant also undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submission of learned counsel of both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant Chhotey be released on bail in Case Crime No. 469 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 376 I.P.C., P.S.j Bilsi, District Badaun, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed for framing of charge, recording of evidence as well as recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. or through counsel on other dates and in case of absence without sufficient cause, it will be deemed that he is abusing the liberty of bail enabling the court concerned to take necessary action in accordance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. or Sections 174A and 229A I.P.C.
(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 23.2.2018 /Bhanu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chhotey vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 February, 2018
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Srivastava
Advocates
  • Bharat Singh