Today Advocates are abstaining from work. I have perused the record.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to the respondents.
The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura to decide the application 6-C dated 06.10.2020 filed in Original Suit No.660 of 2020 (Chhiddi Singh Versus Subhash Chandra Agarwal and another) and a further prayer has been made to direct the parties to maintain status quo in respect of suit property till the disposal of the injunction application within stipulated period.
In the facts and circumstances of the case the Court is of the opinion that the interim injunction filed by the petitioner before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura be decided.
In view of the same, without entering into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura to pass appropriate orders on the application 6-C filed by the petitioner on the next date fixed. In case, on the said date on account of any reason, the said application could not decide, the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura will decide the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months thereafter.
Order Date :- 26.2.2021 Swati