Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Chhidana vs Board Of

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 5845 of 2018 Petitioner :- Chhidana Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar,Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging an order dated 04.01.2017 passed by the Tehsildar in proceedings under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act. Not only the writ petition is highly belated and is reported from laches of 620 days, against the order impugned, petitioner has statutory alternative remedy by means of an appeal under Section 210 followed by a revision under Section 219 of the UP Land Revenue Act, which remidies have not been availed by him.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of availability of a statutory alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 Priyanka
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chhidana vs Board Of

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Akhilesh Kumar Akhilesh Kumar Pandey