Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chetan vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56701 of 2019 Applicant :- Chetan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav,Atmaram Nadiwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri I.P. Srivastava, learned AGA.
The Court is unable to countenance the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail since the transit pass for the minor minerals as well as the weighment are not correlatable to the total amount of the minor minerals which were seized and which seizure forms the subject matter of the impugned FIR. Since the interest of public revenue is directly involved, the Court finds no ground to accord the liberty of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
The application is rejected.
Order Date :- 18.12.2019 LA/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chetan vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 December, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Dinesh Kumar Yadav Atmaram Nadiwal