IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.8540 OF 2016 (LA - RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. CHENNAHANUMAKKA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O LATE A.HANUMANTHAPPA, R/AT NO.3886, III CROSS, GAYATHRINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 021. REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT. RAJESHWARI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O B. HUTCHE GOWDA, R/AT NO.3886, III CROSS, GAYATHRINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 021 …PETITIONER (BY SRI H C SHIVARAMU, ADV. - ABSENT) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU – 560 001.
2. THE THASILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 562123 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H. VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA. – ABSENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DT.30.1.2016 VIDE ANNX-M TO ALLOT THE LAND IN SY.NO.99/1E MEASURING 1 ACRE OF LAND WHICH WAS ACQUIRED FOR FORMATION OF ASHRAYA LAYOUT UNDER NOTIFICATION DT.20.3.1977 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 11.05.1978 AT ANNX-G WHICH REMAINED UNUTILIZED IN LIEU OF THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER IN SY.NO.99/1D MEASURING 1 ACRE 23 GUNTAS HAVING BEEN UTILIZED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASHRAYA SITES FORTHWITH ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The plea of the petitioner is for a writ of mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 30.01.2016 vide Annexure ‘M’.
2. It is just and appropriate to direct respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 30.01.2016 vide Annexure ‘M’.
3. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed off.
Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation dated 30.01.2016 vide Annexure ‘M’ and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
SD/- JUDGE nvj